As many of you know, the EPA recently announced that it would be phasing out the Climate Leaders program. This announcement comes at a time when Congress has failed to pass meaningful climate legislation, the Administration is struggling with its approach to leading climate change response, and significant challenges are pending to AB 32 in California.
This past week, the EPA hosted its final Climate Leaders meeting in New Orleans. I was invited to participate in and speak at the program and wanted to share some of the comments that were made by attendees with my perspectives on those comments:
A large number of attendees expressed concern about replacing the technical support and expertise that had been offered by EPA through this program.
My thoughts: While EPA’s technical support was obviously invaluable to its partners, it’s clear to me that member companies can obtain that expertise by collaborating with peers in industry, government, academia and the non-profit community. In particular, NGOs such as The Climate Registry, World Resources Institute and the Carbon Disclosure Project have been working with numerous companies in this regard.
Given the resource constraints that EPA is apparently under and its intent to regulate under the Clean Air Act, it’s not realistic to expect that the technical support offered under this program continue. While this means that industry is going to have to foot the bill for this support, expecting that it come at no cost from government is not practical.
The luster of the program to executives was associated with EPA’s involvement, which significantly enhanced the program brand’s value.
My thoughts: The credibility that government brings in these sorts of programs is undeniable. EPA’s ENERGY STAR program and the USDA’s “Organic” certification have become cornerstones for retailers moving toward carrying more progressive product lines.
That said, it’s worth pointing there are numerous instances where comparable brands have been established without government involvement. Some examples that come to mind include the LEED certification for buildings, which clearly has dominated EPA’s ENERGY STAR for Buildings in brand value. Other examples of brands that have become dominant players for professionals and companies include Martindale Hubbell’s ratings for attorneys (who are peer-reviewed), the Better Business Bureau, American Hospital Association’s certification programs and Michelin ratings for hotels.
A combination of stakeholders from industry, government and the non-profit community could clearly come together to develop solutions for ensuring that a highly credible brand (whether EPA or not) survives this ordeal.
EPA Plans to issue an RFP to ensure that certain aspects of the Climate Leaders program are continued.
My thoughts: It is unclear as to what EPA plans to cover through this RFP, though a recognition program for climate leadership was referenced. I commented publicly (and in private to several EPA officials) that a good start would be to reinstate the EPA Climate Protection Award program, which went unfunded this year. That said, it could be at least a month or two (if not longer) before this RFP is issued, and the results of the RFP (winners and impacts from the “new programs”) could be at least 6-12 months away.
Many attendees expressed a desire to have access to one another by way of a community of peers and expressed disappointment that they would not be able to collaborate at future Climate Leaders events.
My thoughts: Collaboration and community development is not a primary function of a regulatory body. While I recognize the importance of EPA using its power and resources to convene thought and action leaders, the establishment and nourishment of peer-to-peer organizations is not their function. It is incumbent on all sectors to work together to establish and nourish a community of climate professionals.
Companies asked how they would message this internally, in particular, referencing that executive support had come because of EPA’s involvement in the program.
My thoughts: SAP’s Jim Sullivan (an ACCO Board member and formerly manager of the EPA Climate Leaders program) shared a concern that this transition might result in the pushing downward of focus within organizations from senior and chief executives to technical and middle management. This is clearly an important concern. ACCO has endeavored to bring together senior executives looking at climate change from a business and economic perspective to collaborate with one another. It’s imperative that EPA develop a solution to the risk of losing the interest and involvement of this level of executive in industry.
How Should Members Convey the Phase Out of the Program and the Transition to Leadership in Their Companies
My thoughts: It was clear from this past week’s meeting that members felt the program had provided significant value to them over the past 8 years. There was a collective sigh or groan that could be heard miles away when it became clear that there would be no recourse to continue or revive the program. Additionally, the message from EPA was not clear, so a substantial guidance from EPA on the transition will be imperative for members of the program.
While nobody wants to hear this, the program is a closed book. Climate Leaders served its purpose from EPA's perspective in mobilizing industry to reduce greenhouse gas emissions during an Administration that demonstrated a complete lack of support for establishing climate policy. From industry's perspective, participating in the program has provided significant value in recognition, education and opportunity.
The message to convey to leadership is that this program has helped organizations quantify emissions, set goals and recognize that climate change and greenhouse gas emissions impact the company's bottom line. Now, it's time for companies to ask broader questions such as "What does climate change mean for my company?" and "What do we need to do to respond to climate change?" Identifying and participating in communities and programs that help with strategies for responding to climate change (including, but not limited to inventory quantification and reduction) is the next step.
A Time for Action
All of the areas of concern expressed by members of the program are valid and should not be disregarded or diminished in importance. However, a vibrant community of thought and action leaders from industry, government, academia and the non-profit community could clearly create a community and related programs that not only covered the gaps being created by the phase out of the Climate Leaders program, but frankly, could go much further than the program ever endeavored.
Imagine a community of climate professionals collaborating to develop best practices and methodologies, establishing standards and strategies for operationalizing supply chain programs, aggregating interests on emerging technologies, setting standards for energy efficiency and clean energy consumption, collaborating on adaptation, developing strategies for managing waste, assessing lifecycles of products and operations, and advancing the profession and function of climate change leadership in organizations …
This is the vision we had when we launched the Association of Climate Change Officers two years ago. This community can exist … it does exist … it needs to exist … and it will only realize its full potential if climate professionals across sectors take ownership and responsibility in building this community.
So I put it back to you the reader … are you going to wait on EPA or someone else to build YOUR community, or are you going to be a leader in establishing it yourself?
If you read the last question and felt motivated to help us build this community, please join us on November 8-9 at our Climate Change Leadership Summit for the first event for climate professionals featuring more than 25 working group sessions and designed to launch collaboration not just at the event, but going forward as well.
Industry and government organizations in the healthcare sector are increasingly addressing the impacts of climate change and energy on operations. The sector is amongst the more intensive users of energy and natural resources in support of its operations. As energy costs rise and availability of natural resources declines, the healthcare community will face significant challenges and opportunities related to procurement, facilities management and design.
Recent studies indicate a convergence of interests related to climate change, energy, and medical and global health. This workshop will examine the role of supply chain programs, green building design and retrofits, and facilities management in improving patient health and response to treatment, and reducing energy consumption, operational costs and greenhouse gas emissions.On September 29, the Association of Climate Change Officers invites you to a full-day workshop examining opportunities to modernize healthcare institutions and facilities with respect to energy consumption, greenhouse gas emissions and improved patient response.
SPEAKERS
Additional speakers and program agenda will be announced shortly
PROGRAM HIGHLIGHTS
REGISTRATION INFORMATION
VENUE & LODGING INFORMATION
Eligible registrants paying the full fee will be offered a 15% discount off individual membership in ACCO for the first year of membership.
Interested in attending?
Click here to Register
Unfiltered: Dan Kreeger on an Environment of ChangeThere's been lots of conversation locally and nationally about the “green”movement. One question I continue to wonder is whether Detroit could tap intothis opportunity – and grow new jobs as a result.
Here are some of his thoughts on how companies, communities and more aremaking climate change profitable. Maybe Detroiters can find some gold at the endof this rainbow.
Modernizing the Workforce: A Look at HowIndustry is Addressing Energy and Climate Change in a Tough Economy
By Daniel Kreeger, Executive Director, Association of Climate ChangeOfficers
As corporate America digs out of one of the most significant recessions inAmerican history, a wealth of significant risks and opportunities lie aheadrelated to managing energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions. Energycosts are on the rise, and at some point, presumably, a Federal greenhouse gasregulatory regime will be passed by Congress.
However, industry need not wait for a milestone in that regard. I amfrequently asked whether I believe that climate change is real — my answer isalways quite simply, “the business case for responding to climate change andenergy considerations is here … now.” In fact, one could argue that industry isdecades past due for a complete overhaul in how business is conducted,professionals are educated and trained, management is structured and how energyand environmental considerations are factored into the business bottom line.
In the past few decades, extraordinary changes have taken place in areas thathave an enormous impact on business considerations. Those include:
To address some of these considerations, industry leaders are increasingly trying to augment their current governance and operational approach by addingcapable professionals to their teams. However, most companies have not madesignificant changes to governance structures, education and training for middleand senior management, or how their middle management and executives engage oneanother.
Read more at:Operation Supply Chain: Assessing Material Risks and
Opportunities Related to Energy and Greenhouse Gas Emissions
June 22, 2010 | 1:30 pm -5:30 pm (central)
Renaissance Blackstone Hotel | Chicago, Illinois
(click here to register)
|
Co-Presented by:
|
Changes taking place in the regulatory and economic business landscapes require companies to understand and take action on GHG emissions. Physical shifts in the climate are driving increased adaptation measures, and regulation is mounting on all levels. According to a 2008 McKinsey study, as much as80% of a company's climate-related risk and opportunity resides in the supply chain. Leading companies and governmental organizations are collecting and acting on this information to prepare for competition in a low-carbon economy.
ACCO and The Climate Registry invite you to series of case studies and discussions on developing a sound operational approach to assessing risk and opportunity throughout the value chain. This half-day workshop is being hosted in conjunction with the North America Climate Policy Forum at the Renaissance Blackstone Hotel Chicago.
Program Highlights
Speakers and Agenda
Please visit http://www.ACCOonline.org/ccls/supplychain-june2010.html to stay up-to-date on event information.
Topics Addressed
Registration Fees
Eligible registrants paying the full fee will be offered a 25% discount off individual membership in ACCO for the first year of membership.
Venue, Lodging and Other Logistical Information
Climate Change and Alternative Energy Under NEPA and its State Counterparts
Thursday, June 10, 2010
12:00 pm - 1:30 pm (eastern)
(Click here to register)
Speakers:
![]() |
As Federal and state government agencies explore various approaches to regulating climate change and energy, the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and its state counterparts are increasingly playing a key role in the debate.
A recent statement issued by CEQ Chairwoman Nancy Sutley suggested that while greenhouse gas emissions could not be regulated under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), "NEPA compels Federal agencies to consider environmental effects before undertaking significant actions or policies [and that] CEQ sees no basis for excluding greenhouse gas emissions from that consideration."
Additionally, high profile alternative energy projects have been held up in the courts and in the permitting process as part of the environmental impact analyses under NEPA and state counterparts. The controversial Cape Wind project exemplifies one of such matters.
On June 10, the Association of Climate Change Officers and BNA invite you to a discussion featuring leading NEPA practitioners who will discuss recent NEPA and state counterpart activity related to climate change and alternative energy.
Registration Fees:
Interested in attending?
Click here to Register
Addressing Energy, Climate Change and National Security:
Opportunities for Innovation Through Public / Private Partnerships
April 29, 2010
12:00pm - 1:30pm (eastern)
The Department of Defense (DoD) is the largest consumer of energy in the US. Defense officials have suggested that cutting energy consumption and adopting renewable energy solutions are critical both to improving the energy security of our military forces and to address climate change. Leadership in the Department of Energy has asserted that US energy goals cannot be met without leadership by DoD, because of its history of innovation and because the energy problems that face the nation also create operational challenges for the military. This webinar brings together 3 visionary leaders from the Defense Department who are building programs to address these issues and are reaching out to the private sector for both partners and solutions.
On April 29, 2010, the Association of Climate Change Officers and BNA invite you to a discussion on the role of DoD in developing and testing new energy technologies to solve our common problems of energy and climate security. This 90-minute program will highlight existing DoD efforts and opportunities for the defense community to collaborate with industry and the NGO community.
SPEAKERS:
Please click here to register for this complimentary webinar.
Climate Change in the Courts: A Look at How Litigation is Shaping Policy and Business Risks
Tuesday, April 27, 2010
12:00 pm - 1:30 pm (Eastern)
As Federal policymakers debate the merits of prospective climate change and energy legislation, an emerging series of battles is taking placein state and Federal courts. A combination of common law nuisance litigation matters, policy measures emanating from the Supreme Court’s ruling in Massachusetts vs. EPA, and questions concerning the appropriate roles of state and federal government entities.
On April 27, the Association of Climate Change Officers and BNA invite you to a discussion featuring leading climate change environmental law scholars from the Columbia Law School Center for Climate Change Law, Georgetown Climate Center and the Environmental Law Institute. Our panelists will discuss:
FEES:
Please click here to register for this webinar.
In response to inquiries regarding participating in our upcoming April 14 workshop by web conference, we have arranged for this event to be simulcast as a webinar for interested persons outside of the San Francisco Bay Area. Thus, please note the updated registration offering below.
|
Kristin Tyll
248.824.8200
Daniel Kreeger
202.496.7390
University of Michigan and the Association of Climate Change Officers Announce Partnership
for Executive Education Courses Focused on Business Impacts of Climate Change
Partners create hybrid course featuring lectures from thought leaders
at the University of Michigan, FedEx, Bayer and Applied Materials
Ann Arbor, Mich. – March 10, 2010 – The University of Michigan Ross School of Business Executive Education (U-M) announced today that it has joined forces with the Association of Climate Change Officers (ACCO) to bring industry experts into its executive education programs focused on climate change. U-M will hold its first executive education program on climate change, “Climate Change: What’s Your Business Strategy?,” on May 17-18, 2010.
This first of its kind partnership in the climate change sector will enhance the resources made available to course attendees and will bolster U-M’s outreach to industry. U-M will leverage the considerable thought leadership and experience amongst ACCO’s members to include in the curriculum. The May course is designed to provide business leaders with a greater understanding of the risks and opportunities associated with climate change and provide critical tools to craft a forward-looking strategy for their organizations.
“The focus in recent years has been from managing risk and protecting the bottom-line, to realizing that climate change is a market shift that every organization must address,” said Andrew Hoffman, Holcim (US) Professor of Sustainable Enterprise at the University of Michigan. “This course was created to help companies identify ways that climate strategies can add value to their business. If done well, a strategy around climate change can provide an organization a compelling competitive advantage.”
“Businesses that ignore the debate over climate change do so at their peril,” said Hoffman. “Climate change policies are imminent, and they will alter key aspects of business strategy, including production economics, cost competitiveness and investment decisions.”
“We are thrilled to collaborate with the University of Michigan Ross School of Business to establish our first executive education course as part of our recently launched Climate Change Leadership Series,” said Daniel Kreeger, ACCO’s co-founder and executive director. “Climate change represents an incredibly broad range of challenges and opportunities for industry — addressing it successfully will require, amongst other important actions, developing sophisticated education and training for industry executives. This course brings together the best and brightest in academia and industry, who will work together to educate industry executives on business impacts related to climate change.”
ACCO board members Mitch Jackson, Staff Director of Environmental Affairs at FedEx, and Valerie Patrick, Sustainability Coordinator, Bayer Corporation, and ACCO advisory board member Bruce Klafter, Head of Environmental, Health & Safety (EHS) and Sustainability at Applied Materials will be amongst industry leaders who will provide case studies at the course, offering insights from recognized experts from organizations that are amongst the most accredited thought and action leaders on climate change.
“Climate Change: What’s Your Business Strategy?,” presented by Andrew J. Hoffman, Thomas P. Lyon, Knute Nadelhoffer and 2007 Nobel Peace Prize co-recipient, Henry Pollack, will draw upon real-world examples from Fortune 500 companies including FedEx, Bayer and Applied Materials to provide tomorrow’s business leaders with strategies to both minimize bottom-line risk and begin to enhance top-line opportunities. The course is designed for multinational companies facing significant challenges to conducting business in more environmentally sustainable ways. Participates of the program will walk away with:
· A scientific basis for taking action on climate change;
· An understanding of the myriad of policies that are being considered for addressing climate change, including a cap-and-trade program (versus a tax), renewable portfolio standards, feed-in tariffs and others;
· Practical, sector-specific tools needed to set effective strategies for managing the business of climate change;
· An understanding of market implications including changes in legislation, voluntary industry initiatives, and associated market drivers;
· Strategies to gain “a seat at the table” of policy development;
· A clear sense of the systemic risks and opportunities associated with climate change; and
· Opportunities for ongoing collaborations with fellow classmates.
The program, developed in partnership with U-M’s nationally-recognized Erb Institute for Global Sustainable Enterprise and the world’s leading global climate change experts, is designed to help companies develop adaptation strategies that focus on climate-related changes in the market and public policy.
“It is vital that companies take the necessary steps to mitigate their impact on global warming,” said Henry Pollack, program faculty member and professor of geophysics at the University of Michigan. “Reducing carbon dioxide emissions should not be seen as an economic penalty, but rather an economic opportunity that will be seized by early responders.”
For more information about the course, please visit: “Climate Change: What’s Your Business Strategy?”
About Executive Education at University of Michigan Ross School of Business
Through its unique model of thought leadership and action-based learning, Executive Education at University of Michigan Ross School of Business partners with leaders to co-create personalized learning experiences to help them realize meaningful results. Ross faculty includes some of the world’s best known and most respected thought leaders, expert at integrating knowledge with competitive insights and practical application. A unique, results-driven approach is one reason that thousands of executives from more than 70 countries around the globe have chosen Ross for Executive Education. The University of Michigan’s worldwide presence includes offices in Hong Kong, Dubai and India. Learn more about Ross Executive Education programs at http://execed.bus.umich.edu/.
About the Association of Climate Change Officers
The Association of Climate Change Officers (ACCO) was founded in August 2008 and incorporated in Washington, DC in January 2009 as a 501(c) (6) non-profit corporation. ACCO’s mission is to advance the knowledge and skills of those dedicated to developing and directing climate change strategies in the public and private sectors, and to establish a flexible and robust forum for collaboration between climate change officers. ACCO members work to assist in developing, promoting and implementing best practices and standards in the private and public sectors regarding climate change strategies; and educate industry and government on the importance of employing qualified professionals, developing sound organizational structures and inducing culture change at all levels. For more information about ACCO, please visit http://www.ACCOonline.org.
About ACCO’s Climate Change Leadership Series
ACCO's Climate Change Leadership Series (CCLS) brings together thought leaders in industry, government, academia and the NGO community on a wide range of issues related to climate change. The series features executive education courses, workshops and conferences designed to advance the knowledge and skills of those dedicated to developing and directing climate change strategies in the public and private sectors. For more information about CCLS, please visit http://www.ACCOonline.org/ccls.
###
External Relations: Developing Strategies for Engaging Industry, Academia, NGOs and Government Entities are increasingly realizing the importance and value in partnering with one another to address a broad spectrum of issues related to climate change. These partnerships, whether focused on developing clean energy or energy efficiency measures, addressing water consumption, reducing GHG emissions, or adaptation to climate change impacts, can achieve significant results and improve the organization’s bottom line results.
On March 23, 2010, ACCO and BNA invite you to a discussion on partnerships between organizations across sectors featuring insights from an expert panel that includes a former California Secretary of Environmental Protection, a former Director of Sustainability for the City of Seattle and case studies from Waste Management. Our panelists will discuss:
SPEAKERS:
Please click here to register for this complimentary program.

Speakers:
Over the past 10 years, investors have increasingly sought to obtain comprehensive information related to the impacts of climate change on publicly traded companies. Groups such as the Carbon Disclosure Project and Ceres have seen a significant increase in disclosures from industry. In early February, the SEC conducted a hearing and published guidance on the its existing disclosure requirements as they relate to climate change matters. While the guidance did not set uniform standards for disclosure, it did highlight examples of areas where climate change may trigger disclosure requirements.
Looking Ahead to Clean Energy Week 2010:
Following a year of unprecedented policy and economic activity related to clean energy in 2009, leading experts from the Alliance to Save Energy, the Clean Economy Network and the Apollo Alliance will look at the current state of the American clean energy sector, analyze the impacts of impending policy initiatives, and identify challenges that the clean energy sector faces in 2010 and beyond.
As a member of the Clean Energy Week steering committee, ACCO invites you to a discussion that will exemplify the events and thought leadership that will take place from February 1-5 in Washington, DC. During this 90-minute presentation, the panelists will:
About Clean Energy Week
Clean Energy Week is an unincorporated joint initiative of over 40 NGOs, Nonprofit groups, associations, companies and government agencies that wish to concentrate the voices of climate and clean energy on positive policy development and passage of legislation in 2010. Clean Energy Week takes place February 1-5, 2010. For more information, please seewww.cleanenergyweek.org.
Copenhagen De-Brief: Reflections on the Successes and Speakers:
In December 2009, the 15th Conference of Parties assembled in Copenhagen to revisit the Kyoto Protocol and seek to develop a worldwide consensus on regulating greenhouse gas emissions in developed and developing countries. While an international treaty was not achieved, there were significant successes and failures realized through this hallmark event, which saw nearly 50,000 delegates worldwide descend upon Copenhagen to participate.